Former Marine Warns of Terrifying Militarized Occupation of American Cities:

by: Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars

Former Marine Paul Szoldra warns that events in Ferguson, Missouri illustrate the “terrifying” result of the militarization of police, with the American people now being treated like insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In an article for Business Insider, Szoldra questions why police in Ferguson are wearing combat gear such as desert camouflage which is normally reserved for troops fighting in foreign war zones.

“We looked intimidating, but all of our vehicles and equipment had a clear purpose for combat against enemy forces. So why is this same gear being used on our city streets?” asks Szoldra, adding, “When did this become OK?”

The former Marine notes how police in Ferguson are armed with military-style rifles with scopes as well as body armor.

“Their uniform would be mistaken for a soldier’s if it weren’t for their “Police” patches,” writes Szoldra. “They wear green tops, and pants fashioned after the U.S. Marine Corps MARPAT camouflage pattern. And they stand in front of a massive armored truck called a Bearcat, similar in look to a mine-resistant ambush protected vehicle, or as the troops who rode in them call it, the MRAP.”

Szoldra cites conversations he had with other former military personnel who pointed out that some of the police in Ferguson are more heavily armed than U.S. troops in an “actual warzone.”

“When did “protect and serve” turn into “us versus them”? asks Szoldra, asserting that the sight of police in militarized combat gear is not helping the situation.

“In Afghanistan, we patrolled in big, armored trucks. We wore uniforms that conveyed the message, “We are a military force and we are in control right now.” Many Afghans saw us as occupiers. And now we see some of our police officers in this same way,” writes Szoldra, concluding, “If there’s one thing I learned in Afghanistan, it’s this: (article continues)

Share

Edward Snowden: Lies Pushed Me Over the Edge

by: Rob Lever AFP Edward Snowden says dishonest comments to Congress by the US intelligence chief were the final straw that prompted him to flee the country and reveal a trove of national security documents.

In an interview with Wired magazine in Moscow, where he sought asylum after the revelations, Snowden said he had long been troubled by the activities of the National Security Agency (NSA), which employed him as a contractor.

But it was only when Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told lawmakers that the agency does “not wittingly” collect data on millions of American citizens that he was angry enough to act.

The magazine released the article online Wednesday, along with several new photographs of the once-elusive Snowden, including a cover shot of the technician lovingly cradling an American flag.

Snowden says he made his decision to leave his office in Hawaii and head to Hong Kong with secret documents on thumb drives after reading in March 2013 about Clapper briefing a Senate committee.

“I think I was reading it in the paper the next day, talking to coworkers, saying, can you believe this…?” Snowden said.

Following his sensational leaks about the scale of US global surveillance and how the NSA sucks up data on US users’ phone calls, Clapper apologized to the Senate for his “erroneous” remarks.

Snowden told Wired that he had already thought about “whistle-blowing” several times… article continues

Share

RNC Trades Ron Paul For “Empty Chair”! Dan Johnson of P.A.N.D.A. joins “Agree to Disagree”

Please leave your comments below.

The New American Media’s Brian Engelman once again welcomes Dan Johnson, founder of P.A.N.D.A. to discuss the RNC, PAUL-Fest, Ron Paul, NDAA, Liberty & more.

Ron Paul should have been guaranteed a speaking role at the RNC because he won a plurality of delegates from 5 states, but the RNC decided to cheat by changing the rules in the middle of the game to keep Ron Paul from speaking.

As an extra slap in the face to Ron Paul and his supporters, surprise speaker, Clint Eastwood actually brought in an empty chair to engage in a ten minute long conversation instead.

Ron Paul earned the right to speak, whether you agree with him or not.

Instead, the old guard, establishment/dinosaur Republicans traded Ron Paul’s speech for an empty chair symbolizing an empty conscience.

Please follow us on Twitter @American_Media_
Please click “subscribe” to our YouTube channel: www.Youtube.com/TheNewAmericanMedia.

Share